Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Jan 11, 2021 in Information Management, What's new | 0 comments

Checklist of key considerations to keep in mind in order to select a new digital data collection tool in a responsible way

Checklist of key considerations to keep in mind in order to select a new digital data collection tool in a responsible way

The health crisis has prompted many organizations to adapt their data collection practices. These changes included using new tools, or being forced to scale up tools that they had only previously used only on a smaller scale. For instance, some organizations began collecting sensitive data such as Sexual and Gender Based Violence (SGBV) alerts using CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing) software, when they had only previously done so through paper-based data collection. Others generalized the use of smartphones to all their data collection activities, which until then had been limited to monitoring infrastructures. 


The introduction of new tools or the scaling up of these tools necessarily raises data protection issues as soon as the data collected is personal and/or sensitive. However, it often turns out that local and international aid organizations do not have the resources (time, human resources, etc.) or even the skills to analyze tools from a data protection perspective.

This checklist therefore aims to provide some elements of popularization and awareness raising to help in the decision-making process of choosing a new data collection tool through a data protection lens.

You can read the document by downloading it in PDF format by clicking here or by clicking on the image.

Whether you have found this resource useful or not, we would love to hear back from you 😊 Please take one minute to fill in this 5-question survey (https://framaforms.org/questionnaire-de-satisfaction-help-center-covid-19-1594987789) to help improve the guidance we will continue producing in the context of this project!

– – – – – – – –

This project was co-funded by the French Development Agency (AFD) and the H2H Network’s H2H Fund, the latter supported by UK aid from the UK government. Nevertheless, the ideas and opinions presented in this document do not necessarily represent those of the H2H Network, UK aid and AFD.

Post a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

🚚 📦 We're moving!

[French below]

The content of the CartoBlog was transferred to the Information Management Resource Portal in May 2021: https://www.im-portal.org/

Please note that the CartoBlog will be decommissioned in early 2022. From now on, we warmly encourage you to consult the tutorials, benchmarking studies and other resources directly onto the new portal.

Thank you!


--
🚚 📦 On déménage !

Le contenu du CartoBlog a été transféré sur l’IM Resource Portal en mai 2021 : https://www.im-portal.org/

Veuillez noter que le CartoBlog sera désactivé au début de l’année 2022. Nous vous invitons, dès à présent, à prendre l’habitude de consulter les tutoriels, benchmarkings et autres ressources directement sur le nouveau portail.

Merci !